The changing epidemiology of pulmonary infection in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis: an 18-year experience

The impact of evolving treatment regimens, airway clearance strategies, and antibiotic combinations on the incidence and prevalence of respiratory infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) in children and adolescents remains unclear. The incidence, prevalence, and prescription trends from 2002 to 2019 with 18,339 airway samples were analysed. Staphylococcus aureus [− 3.86% (95% CI − 5.28–2.43)] showed the largest annual decline in incidence, followed by Haemophilus influenzae [− 3.46% (95% CI − 4.95–1.96)] and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [− 2.80%95% CI (− 4.26–1.34)]. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria and Burkholderia cepacia showed a non-significant increase in incidence. A similar pattern of change in prevalence was observed. No change in trend was observed in infants < 2 years of age. The mean age of the first isolation of S. aureus (p < 0.001), P. aeruginosa (p < 0.001), H. influenza (p < 0.001), Serratia marcescens (p = 0.006) and Aspergillus fumigatus (p = 0.02) have increased. Nebulised amikacin (+ 3.09 ± 2.24 prescription/year, p = 0.003) and colistin (+ 1.95 ± 0.3 prescriptions/year, p = 0.032) were increasingly prescribed, while tobramycin (− 8.46 ± 4.7 prescriptions/year, p < 0.001) showed a decrease in prescription. Dornase alfa and hypertonic saline nebulisation prescription increased by 16.74 ± 4.1 prescriptions/year and 24 ± 4.6 prescriptions/year (p < 0.001). There is a shift in CF among respiratory pathogens and prescriptions which reflects the evolution of cystic fibrosis treatment strategies over time.


Clinical routine during the study period
In our centre which encompasses a large region in New South Wales, outpatient (CF clinic) reviews occur four times a year, with infants or those who are clinically unwell reviewed on a more frequent basis.During these visits, airway samples are routinely collected regardless of the presence or absence of symptoms either through spontaneous expectoration (typically in older children), oropharyngeal suctioning performed by a trained CF nurse (typically in younger children), or via bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL).Airway samples microbiological cultures are ordered based on either BAL culture order label (samples obtained via BAL) or sputum CF culture order label (samples obtained through either spontaneously expectorated sputum or airway sample obtained from oropharyngeal suctioning).
All infants less than one year of age have been prescribed oral flucloxacillin or occasionally amoxicillin and clavulanic acid from diagnosis as part of our CF clinics' routine Staphylococcus aureus prophylaxis approach for over 20 years.
In terms of the microbiological practices which has remained consistent during this study period, sputum specimens have been set up on (1) MacConkey agar for gram-negative bacteria e.g., coliforms, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Inquilinus limosus, (2) Anaerobically incubated chocolate agar with Bacitracin for Haemophilus influenzae.(3) Mannitol salt agar for S. aureus (4) Horse blood agar for e.g., Streptococcus pneumoniae and Moraxella catarrhalis.(5) Cepacia agar for Burkholderia cepacia and incubated for 7 days.(6) Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) testing is performed in an external Mycobacterium Reference Laboratory (MRL) using the automated blood culture system (BD BACTEC™) and testing occurs annually.Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) has been used since 2015 for the rapid identification of organisms.
The microbiologist's report on the results of the collected airway samples is routinely reviewed by the CF team within 5-7 days after the samples are obtained.Treatment, where applicable following discussion with the primary CF physician is then prescribed.The treatment strategy includes; admission for parenteral antibiotics, a course of oral antibiotics, and/or nebulised antibiotic treatment.

Case definitions and stratification
Incidence was defined as the first time a respiratory pathogen of interest is isolated from the sputum of the child or adolescent with CF.Once the child or adolescent is an incident case for that particular pathogen, they were excluded from the denominator for the subsequent years.
Prevalence was defined as a child or adolescent with a respiratory pathogen isolated from their sputum in a specific year.Once the child or adolescent is a prevalent case for that particular pathogen, any further positive culture of the same pathogen isolated from the same child or adolescent was excluded for the remainder of that year.
The cohort was divided into four age groups: < 2 years, 2-5 years, 6-11 years, and > 12 years.The rationale behind this age group includes (1) biological variability in terms of differences in microbiome composition, immune system development and environmental exposure e.g. home or pre-school (2) management approaches such as methods of physiotherapy, lung function testing or the availability of medications such as dornase alfa (3) to align with existing clinical trials in CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and CF registry reports.
In terms of medications prescribed and obtained from the hospital pharmacy, prescription of oral antimicrobials (including amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, flucloxacillin, and itraconazole), nebulised antimicrobials (including amikacin, colistin, and tobramycin), and other medications (including dornase-alfa, hypertonic saline nebules, and CFTR modulators and correctors) were reviewed.

Statistical analysis
We used descriptive statistics to summarise the data, reporting organism incidence and prevalence as n (%).To assess changes over time, we calculated the annual incidence and prevalence of each organism based on individual airway samples, and used regression analysis to evaluate these measures.Based on the coefficients obtained from the regression model, the average change in incidence and prevalence was presented.Prescription trends were also analysed on an individual basis.Results are reported as % change (with 95% confidence intervals) for incidence and prevalence, and as number of prescriptions/year ± standard deviation for medications prescribed.Changes in the mean age of first organism isolation were assessed using analysis of variance.All statistical calculations were performed using the SPSS Statistic Data Editor (IBM Version 28, New York, USA, 2021).Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Study population and bacterial samples
During the study period, 419 children and adolescents with CF were followed up with 206 (49.2%) born on, or after 1st January 2002.A total of 18,339 airway samples were collected during the study period with 401 (2.2%) collected via bronchioalveolar lavage, with the remaining samples obtained from expectorated sputum or oropharyngeal suction.
Out of the total airway samples that were collected, 724 (3.9%) samples met the criteria for incidence and 15,332 (83.6%) samples met the criteria for prevalence as defined in the methodology of this study were included in the analysis.

Changes of overall and age-specific incidence and prevalence of CF organisms from 2002 to 2019
Amongst the organisms with the highest incidence, S. aureus showed the largest decline in incidence over time, followed by H. influenza and P. aeruginosa.Meanwhile, NTM and B. cepacia showed a non-significant increase in incidence.A similar pattern of change in prevalence was observed (Tables 1, 2).
With respect to age groups, incidence of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, H. influenza and A. fumigatus in children < 2 years of age have remained unchanged.A similar pattern of change in prevalence was observed.Meanwhile, NTM showed a significant increase in both incidence and prevalence in children 6-11 years of age.

Discussion
This paediatric-focused study evaluates annual changes in the incidence and prevalence rates of respiratory pathogens across different age groups, while also comparing medication prescription trends over an 18-year period.This study provides valuable data from a real-world clinical setting where infants under the age of one receive universal antimicrobial prophylaxis and, standardised respiratory pathogen surveillance is conducted by qualified personals using consistent sampling and microbiological testing protocols.In particular, obtaining samples through sputum and oropharyngeal suctioning is considered to have the highest concordance with BAL samples, rendering them more representative of lower airway infections compared to other sampling methods like throat or cough swabs 18 .The findings contribute to our understanding of the long-term trends in respiratory pathogens and associated clinical management in the paediatric population, particularly in the modern era of eradication therapy 15 .
Our study showed that together, S. aureus and P. aeruginosa make up the majority of respiratory pathogens both in terms of incidence (51.3%) and prevalence (82.3%).Data preceding 2000, report prevalence of these two respiratory pathogens to be higher at 95% 14 .
Registry data taken from 2018 to 2020 showed a prevalence of P. aeruginosa of 20.9% 17  3.4 6.9 3.4 6.9 6.9 6.9 P. aeruginosa of 17.6% and S. aureus of 45.3%.Of the less frequent respiratory pathogens, NTM prevalence was 4.3% from registry data vs 3.7% from our cohort and B.cepacia was 3.2% vs. 1.3% respectively.In a recent publication by VanDevanter et al., a trend of decline in P. aeruginosa prevalence was observed, as evidenced by the examination and presentation of registry data within a comparable time frame 19 .Following this, Fischer et al. raised a crucial question regarding whether the observed changes in P. aeruginosa over time were also apparent in other respiratory pathogens of interest in CF 20 .We have demonstrated that over the past 18 years, the incidence and prevalence of the most common respiratory pathogens in CF such as S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, H. influenzae and A. fumigatus have decreased steadily.This significant decline of between 2 and 4% of individual respiratory pathogens are observed both in the incidence and prevalence.Meanwhile, less common organisms such as NTM, B. cepacia and A. xylosoxidans, S. maltophilia showed no significant change in terms of incidence and prevalence.
We also found that the incidence and prevalence of respiratory pathogens remain unchanged for infants up to 2 years of age across all respiratory pathogens.Additionally, we have found that our cohort of children and adolescents with CF are found to have a positive airway sample culture for these respiratory pathogens significantly later that the earlier years of this study.
Our centre has adopted the universal use of S. aureus prophylactic antibiotics in infants diagnosed with CF preceding this study period.In a systematic analysis performed which reviewed four studies, there was a weak indication that P.aeruginosa was isolated less frequently in children under three years and more frequently in children between three to six years in the prophylactic group 21 .In contrast, despite our universal use of prophylactic antibiotics in infants, our study shows (1) a decline in the incidence and prevalence of P. aeruginosa, (2) no significant increase in the incidence and prevalence of organisms such as NTM and B. cepacia (3) an increase in the mean age of first isolation of respiratory pathogens of interest, (4) no change of incidence and prevalence of respiratory pathogen < 2 years of age.A contributing factor in terms of improvements in infection control practices may have helped keep our incidence and prevalence lower than the national average.While being potentially circumstantial, these findings suggest that the use of prophylactic anti-staphylococcal antibiotics is not associated with an increase in P. aeruginosa or increase in prevalence of other less common respiratory pathogen.Prospective studies such as the CF-START study in evaluating outcomes of prophylactic treatments will hopefully provide conclusive proof of its benefits and safety 21 .
By examining prescription trends, we have found that there is a rise in the use of anti-pseudomonal nebulised antibiotics such as amikacin and colistin.This suggests that P.aeruginosa is being more aggressively treated over time as both this antibiotics are considered as second line after tobramycin 22 .However, the increase in use of amikacin could also be attributed to an increase in NTM incidence and prevalence.Encouragingly, we have found that the emphasis on respiratory clearance has increased over time with the significant increase in the prescription of dornase alpha and hypertonic saline in our cohort.
Our study comes with certain limitations that warrant consideration.Firstly, the sputum and prescription data lack representation from external laboratories or pharmacies, potentially limiting the comprehensiveness of our findings.Additionally, we did not culture anaerobic bacteria and did not routinely test for co-infection with respiratory viruses, leading to an omission in addressing potential co-infections among these organisms in our study.Moreover, the annual frequency of NTM testing, as opposed to routine CF airway sample cultures, may result in an underrepresentation of NTM within our study cohort.
Thirdly, our data originated from a single CF centre in Australia, raising concerns about the generalisability of our findings to a broader population.Fourthly, our incidence calculation may involve a small number of children or adolescents intermittently found to have these respiratory pathogens in their airway samples.Finally, the relatively limited sample size of children and adolescents on CFTR modulators or correctors is noteworthy, as our study predates the widespread adoption that followed the approval and government funding of these medications in Australia.Current evidence suggests that while it may more difficult to obtain sputum samples in children on CFTR therapy, its' impact on the growth of specific bacterial pathogens needs to be closely examined 23 .The low number of children or adolescents on CFTR modulators or correctors is an important aspect of this study as it will enable future comparison in a post-modulator era in the management of CF.
Our study has several strengths.First, we analysed a large number of sputum samples, both overall and in different age groups, providing a longitudinal comparison of changes in CF treatment over the past 18 years.This is the first study of such magnitude in children and adolescents with CF, providing age-specific incidence and prevalence, as well as prescription trends.In particular, our review of incidences of these organisms and the age of first positive culture provides additional information towards our understanding of CF respiratory pathogens over the past two decades.
Second, our study includes a large cohort of children born on or after January 1st, 2002, when newborn screening has already been well-established, allowing us to assess the acquisition of respiratory pathogens from shortly after birth over the past 18 years.Third, the practice of using prophylactic anti-staphylococcus antibiotics universally has given us the opportunity to assess the outcomes of its' use over a significantly long period of time.While strong conclusions cannot be made without a non-prophylactic control arm, it does provide insight into the long-term impact of its' implementation on respiratory pathogens in our cohort.
In summary, our study shows a change in the epidemiology of CF pathogens in a single large paediatric clinic that practices universal prophylaxis in children.First, we observed a decline in the incidence and prevalence of the most commonly found CF pathogens such as S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, H. influenzae, and A. fumigatus, as well as a delay in the first acquisition of these pathogens.However, less common pathogens such as S. marcescens, NTM, B. cepacia, A. xylosoxidans, and S. maltophilia did not show significant changes.Second, we found no change in the incidence or prevalence of respiratory pathogens in infants under 2 years of age over time.
and S. aureus of 55.26% in children and adolescents under the age of 18.In comparison, our data shows a recent prevalence of www.nature.com/scientificreports/

Table 1 .Table 2 .
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59658-4www.nature.com/scientificreports/Incidence rates of pathogens isolated according to consecutive years.Figures are represented in percentages, indicating the proportion of the respiratory pathogen's presence within each age group over the different years.n = number of children or adolescents with a positive airway sample culture for the corresponding year.The change by year (95% CI) represents the coefficient obtained from regression modeling, indicating the percentage change per year, along with its corresponding 95% confidence interval and p-value.N/A = not applicable.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59658-4www.nature.com/scientificreports/Prevalence rates of pathogens isolated according to consecutive years.Figures are represented in percentages, indicating the proportion of the respiratory pathogen's presence within each age group over the different years.n = number of children or adolescents with a positive airway sample culture for the corresponding year.The change by year (95% CI) represents the coefficient obtained from regression modeling, indicating the percentage change per year, along with its corresponding 95% confidence interval and p-value.N/A = not applicable.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Mean age group of the first culture of CF organisms.